No welcome wagon for the new kid

The news continues to swirl around Mike Schmidt, the newly elected district attorney for Multnomah County, which includes virtually all of Portland. A couple of the stories of the day remind me just how big a deal it was that Schmidt won the election in May.

First, he's being sued in federal court by a right-winger who is accusing him of bad faith prosecution in connection with a melee from last year, while Schmidt has let left-wing rioters go without being charged for similar offenses this year. The case is before Judge Karin Immergut, which makes it especially interesting. She until recently was the U.S. attorney for Oregon, and thus part of the traditional law enforcement network around Portland. Schmidt trounced that network in a stunning three-to-one victory over his opponent in the election. 

Meanwhile, Judge Immergut's successor as U.S. attorney, Billy Williams, continues to act as a shadow district attorney, prosecuting cases, with no genuine federal interest, that Schmidt has declined to pursue. Here's an example – a not-guilty plea on a federal arson charge

As a work-around to avoid Schmidt, Williams has deputized Portland police as deputy federal marshals. The city has attempted to revoke its consent to that action, but Williams has refused to accept the revocation, and now it's not entirely clear where the matter stands.

It's all about Schmidt, who's been on the job only about three months. The old boys, and girls, don't like what he stands for, and they will fight him tooth and nail. But when you win an election three-to-one, that's called a mandate. The people of Multnomah County want something different from what they've been getting by way of law enforcement from the likes of Williams (himself a former Multnomah County prosecutor) and his predecessors in the federal office.

It would be nice if our members of Congress would get involved, and try to straighten out the chaos. But that would take guts that I doubt any of them have.

UPDATE, later that afternoon: An alert reader points out that Judge Immergut's time as U.S attorney ended in 2009. When you're as old as I am, that's "recent," but perhaps not to everyone.


  1. Jack, while our new DA did win by a three to one margin, something tells me it was more about name familiarity and the power of adverting than people agreeing with his politics. I'd be willing to bet good money that if you stopped 10 people on the street and asked them who the DA is, maybe three (and that's being generous) could tell you his name let alone what his polices are.

    1. I was impressed by his .316 batting average and three MVP wins.

      I agree that maybe half the voters didn't know what the heck they were voting for. But many did, and he kicked his opponent's butt, big time.

      As far as stopping people on the street, how many do you think could tell you who the U.S. senators from Oregon are? But they have a mandate.


Post a Comment

The platform used for this blog is awfully wonky when it comes to comments. It may work for you, it may not. It's a Google thing, and beyond my control. Apologies if you can't get through. You can email me a comment at, and if it's appropriate, I can post it here for you.