Nightmare in apple country
Having taken bar exams in a couple of states, and having taught bar review courses for more than 20 years, I can tell you that this is an unmitigated disaster, causing untold angst for about 600 law school graduates who just sacrificed eight weeks cramming for what may be the most important moment of their young lives. And so far, the bureaucrats aren't offering them much by way of consolation or relief:
Renata de Carvalho Garcia, chief regulatory counsel of the Washington State Bar Association, said in an email to test takers that “we do not have sufficient confidence that the technology issues have been resolved” in order to push the exam to Wednesday.
The email said the WSBA is working with the test maker, the National Conference of Bar Examiners, to hold a make-up test on Sept. 1. Test takers can also transfer their applications to the February 2027 sitting or receive a full refund....
Local testing staff in Yakima, Wash., where the test was taking place determined the bandwidth issues couldn’t be resolved in order to complete the test and exam takers were dismissed for the day, according to NCBE. It added that the bandwidth issues “did not involve the NextGen testing platform."
One of my recurring nightmares is being in a strange place and my phone won't work. Hundreds of innocent souls are now living that terrifying dream.
You've got to wonder what the heck the exam was doing in Yakima. The "Palm Springs of Washington" is two to three hours away from the nearest law school. And for that matter, why weren't there at least a couple of different locations closer to where the candidates live? One in Spokane, one in Seattle, one in Vancouver. Easy peasy.
But wherever the exam was held, if the adequacy of the internet access at the test facility was not throughly checked in advance, well, as most of the examinees could have told you on the test, that would be negligence. And there are monetary damages. Think about how much money has been wasted in the applicants' travel expenses. Not to mention the costs of day care for some of their loved ones.
Then there are the celebrations and vacations that are supposed to start tomorrow. They're not going to be half as much fun as was planned, if they happen at all.
But the worst offense is having to continue the cramming ordeal for another month and change (at the least). That's some serious emotional distress.
Already there are calls for just giving everybody in the room a pass to bar membership. But in a normal July exam, only seven out of 10 normally pass; should the other three get a freebie because Yakima is still on dial-up? It will ultimately be up to the state supreme court to decide.
Whatever happens now to the exam-takers, I can't help but join them in saying shame, shame, shame on the Washington bar examiners.
WSBA directed questions about the cause of the WiFi problems to the Yakima Convention & Event Center where the test... took place.
What a load of manure. In any normal organization, heads would roll. But it's a state government bureaucracy, and so that seems unlikely.
There are many other issues with how people become lawyers these days. Don't get me started. But this episode is beyond inexcusable.


Oh how incredibly stressful, my heart goes out to them.
ReplyDeleteAnd what an incredible lack of common sense on the part of the test-givers (using a new product, while the wifi in these big facilities can be sketchy - nobody tested this first-?!).
Well, at least they'll get their first crack at a lawsuit, it'll be good practice while they're waiting for a decision about what to do with them.
("Palm Springs of Washington" - you are so-funny.)
They had no contingency plan? Hello!
ReplyDeleteIn my youth there was a lot conversation about “The Peter Principle “. These meeting organizers seem to be in training for that.
ReplyDeleteGiven the incoming tidal wave of AI slop legal briefs, it's probably a bad idea to issue any bar exam freebies.
ReplyDeleteThis whole thing sent chills down my spine. I took the Oregon State Bar exam in 2008 and swore (even after passing) that I'd never take another one. That's held true since then, although I did have to pass the "mini" (my phrase) exam as part of my reciprocity application for Washington. Professor Bogdanski, you were on sabbatical the year I took tax law at L&C but you taught the bar review course that summer and did a great job!
ReplyDeleteHello, John. Thanks for the kind words. Studying for the bar exam is the intellectual equivalent of preparing for a colonoscopy, but for two months.
DeleteOr,, God forbid, they could have used what we did, on a couple of sweltering east side Portland, poorly ventilated, days in 1969: pen and paper.
ReplyDeleteMakes me wonder if all those would-be attorneys could file a class-action lawsuit against the Bar for gross negligence. Someone dropped the ball there, bigly.
ReplyDeleteLSAT - lousy service angers testers...
ReplyDelete