Already gone
The Portland Trail Blazers basketball team is leaving Oregon. At least the part of Oregon where you pay taxes to fund public services.
It's been revealed that the team is going to push to have the state pay a large chunk of the $600 million liar's budget to renovate the Moda Center arena, in which the team plays. If the state doesn't chip in, the clear implicit threat is that the 'Zers wil leave for another city. Seattle or Las Vegas would welcome them with open arms.
The way the Blazers would get the state money is to have a law passed similar to the one that's supposed to bring a major league baseball team to Portland (which, by the way, is never going to happen). Under that law, the income tax money the state would collect from the Portland baseball players, from the rest of the team's employees, and from visiting players would all go to pay for building the stadium. In the Blazers' case, the funds would go toward renovating the existing game venue. The estimate of the tax revenue is $20 million a year.
Of course, there's an important difference between the baseball pipedream and the Blazers' request. The tax revenue that they're talking about with baseball doesn't exist yet. The tax revenue that the Blazers want spent on their high-priced home court is money that the state already collects and uses. And so unlike the baseball plan, the Blazers' proposal would take $20 million a year out of the state budget as currently configured.
The response, of course, is that if the Blazers leave, so will that $20 million – and lots more as the result of the abrupt economic contraction that such an exit would cause. And so the state will have to decide whether to lose the money and still have the Blazers, or lose even more money and not have the Blazers.
How big a cash grab is this? Well, the $20 million would presumably go to pay off bonds that would fund the arena renovation. At 4 percent interest over 20 years (the bonds would be tax-exempt, I assume, as the city technically owns the building now), $20 million a year has a present value of about $272 million. That ain't hay.
The political throwdown triggered by the team's request sure is going to be interesting. Given that sports teams have become billionaire playthings, given the lousy quality of the product that the Portland organization has put on the floor for many years now, given the hideous tax climate in Portland, and given the terrible financial conditions of the state and city, it's not going to be, well, a slam dunk.
But let the debate begin! And while you're at it, I'd like the state income taxes I pay to replace the roof of my house. How about it, Salem?

I’d wear it as a badge of honor to be a major city sans pro sportsball, to be honest?
ReplyDeleteLet ‘em leave and build something else there for all I care?
I don’t really want those kind of people moving here / that kind of draw, but we’re already so far down that road, you’re not wrong in some ways?
And the draw might as well be here if the building already is?
20mil seems almost reasonable compared to the 300mil for the Zoo, in comparison / per head, at least?
Stadiums are some of the worst land use / crime magnet dead zones on off-hours, restaurants and & stores around them often struggle & when I pass thru; it’s often full of trimet staff standing around at some of the worst stops when not in use.
Just some of the biggest boondoggles as well as urban renewal scams that bulldozed a previously somewhat integrated neighborhoods 2nd only to Robert Moses F’ing over major urban neighborhoods w/freeways / giant car sewers for nouveau riche suburbanites to park their cars like an invading tank army on top of what were tight knit multi-generational previously recession proof and resilient neighborhoods if a bit run down that had been lacking investment / see Charles Marohn’s strong towns models? (Fiscal conservative laps Catholic civil engineer perspective from a smaller / depressed MN town?) s
To need a new stadium after only 20 years…yeah ok, if it’s the King Dome or Candlestick Park with half radioactive bayview Hunters point or peninsula breeze blowing asbestos on your head or horrible wind vortex for the players and a decrepit door w/shot/outdated hydraulic dampe at the top of one of the aisles that could dislocate your shoulder, break your collarbone or knock your teeth out being violently blown shut in the wind @ Candlestick sans luxury boxes to sell when they finally demo’d it @ 40-50 years old before the ‘08 crash back when the economy was still pretty good, fine, especially those being built at peak car centric & urban renewal ‘blighted’ (black?) bulldozer-bait planning, a real eyesore and probably seismic safety hazard, but stadium built in better times / last of the late 90s/early ‘00s better economy with luxury boxes etc.? Why do we need new or to spend more than routine maintenance on it?
It’s sort of like newer cars w/all the Bluetooth integration & big delicate wheels and whizbangs & million sensors made on thin margins after the ‘08 crash…
…who cares? Does it start go, return reasonable comfort, economy & safety (for pedestrians as well) @ low operating cost & do the thing?
Pinch that bloat down / let them saber rattle?
If they wanna go to Sleazeattle and bilk the taxpayers there for all new & shiny, fine?
LO recently replaced their only 30yo city hall, but is ‘partnering’ w/PGE & energy trust to ‘buy’ green energy, but can’t be bothered to string up some solar panels / build one w/a lifespan of ~100 years instead of 20-40.
Sure; they’re the toniest nouveau riche suburb, but the stink / cloud of public-private partnership graft & lack of agency & talent/core competency for all things public is so widespread…
Buildings should be a 300-1000+ year thing we can repurpose and reconstruct, move, repurpose, update and recycle @ reasonable cost if we were more honest?
We should have the modern moral equivalent of the ability to recycle stones from Hadrian’s wall into Yorkshire Castle or square w/robots / labor- saving actual machines or something more worthy?
It’s like we regressed?
20-25 years built w/peak Paul Allen MS $? For shame?
Dream on with your pie-in-the-sky utopian muses
DeleteAlmost as bad/shoddy as the Paul Allen outdoor theater in Ashland of similar early ‘00s vintage?
ReplyDeleteI know outdoor is a unique experience, but the acoustics & views and tacky McMansion proportions are AWFUL on that Paul Allen thing!
Terrible at providing an actual decent theater experience!
The mid-century modern minimalist Angus Bowmer is VASTLY superior and probably was built at a fraction of the cost!
So, yea, F them for saddling us with the repair bill for this (apparently?) defective POS. For shame.
This may inspire me to become a construction lawyer…
…the more I read about 432 park in NYC on billionaires’ row in the NYT monied cosmopolitan liberal squawk box, the more I’m reminded of Charles Dickens lampooning the Chancery Court on disputed inheritances in late Victorian London…
…no construction lawyers in the case of 432 park or adjudicators have any incentive to lower costs until all parties are dead (or our city is in the case of our career bureaucrats?)…
As we scramble over the crumbs, in the case of 432 park in NYC, the residents and builders of which one need not feel sorry for, it’s almost as though they believe if they spend enough on lawyers that that POS will magically get fixed or they’ll be compensated enough to be ‘happy’ (or have any dimly relatable human feeling, whatsoever?)???
You lost me at "those kind of people"...
DeleteI’d like some reusable standing-seam pre-golfball dented acid brushed (preferably?) stainless hail / tree branch proof easily cleaned imitation slate roof that some solar panels can camp to the seams of sans unnecessary roof penitrations/leak points & vulnerabilities made with local PUD hydro and nuclear power?
ReplyDeleteWouldn’t it be nice for a cool 20mil/year?
Unscrew & take the metal roof w/you once you disassemble and move house / grow weary of the municipality or repurpose/rebuild the house?
Wouldn’t it be nice?
Easier to clean, no composite oil industry roofing, cleaner run off, no disposal costs, local hydropower & heavy industry made?
For 20mil/yr?
Does anybody really care if the Blazers leave town?
ReplyDeleteThe roughly 18,500 people a night that go to their games might care.
DeleteThe WNBA team will definitely care.
I suspect the taxpayers that own Moda Center will care if it loses its anchor tenant.
I suspect the vast majority of taxpayers do not give a rat's ass whether the Blazers leave town. The Moda Center lies in the center of a wasteland.
DeleteJack. it appears you hit a hot button with one particular reader with an aversion to the use of periods in their responses.
ReplyDeleteThey appear here from time to time. I didn't read much Faulkner, either.
DeleteI have nicknamed him Slash, because he uses so many of them. It's a handy way of identifying which posts to skip.
DeleteAlmost all public funding for pro sports is a screw job, but I have to say $272M is a slap on the wrist compared to $600M Ohio is paying to move the Browns to the burbs or $1.8B for Kansas to move the Chiefs 15 miles across the border. To build stadiums that get used 10 times a year.
ReplyDeleteThe Blazers should and could be a lot better had they made better draft selections, but they're not the Browns!
It's also about 5% of what Tom just paid for the team. Real cheapskate stuff. Especially since they could probably increase revenue more by putting out a better product on the court, hiring fewer coaches accused of sexual assault, and having better than Sysco food in the courtside seats and boxes.
Would Portland get any benefits for their investment? Free rental for 10 nights for events? Free tickets for PPS students?
The only city to get public funding of pro sports right is Green Bay, but that model is pretty much outlawed by the leagues for anyone else.
$272 million is literally a nod to the NBA league office that "OK, we did due diligence, we didn't let a city keep a team without setting a bad precedent for Memphis or New Orleans ownership." It's such a small amount comparatively.
DeleteOKC is building a new arena with $900 million in sales taxes – to replace the arena they built 20 years ago with… sales taxes.
Things could be far, far worse.
They could also be far, far better. Paul Allen was told to build it himself, and he did. The new Blazer owners are nowhere near rich enough. We'll see how they do with the Socialist City Council.
DeleteThe homeless industry exists in perpetuity because they blame capitalism for why they can't get people help. We can do the same thing with Sports teams, but what good will it do? The Blazers are the only major pro sports team in town and have had many, many good years of providing high-level sports entertainment. They need to stay for the good of the city and all the thousands of fans that enjoy them. I think the ask is reasonable. But go ahead and piss on them, cause capitalism bad and see how that works out for getting Portland back.
ReplyDeleteIt's worth remembering that Moda is now a publicly-owned building. Our tenant is asking for some support to match the tenant improvements they're doing. It's not a great position to be in, but it's also not dreadful to have a tenant asking for a few improvements in order to renew their lease.
ReplyDeleteDoes it matter that this tenant owned the building before they transferred it to us (thus saving gobs of property tax)?
ReplyDeleteCould be worse for sure…
ReplyDeleteGreen Bay model would be great, but it’s still football with limited # of games in a depressed rust belt place.
Idk that blazers fans exactly have the rep of Scotland’s Glaswegian Rangers vs. Celtics fans & football hooliganism tied to (more in the past?) sectarian violence, but the quality of play & product might also make them similarly sale-proof to a billionaire or explicit Saudi petro-dollar buyer?
Idk, I agree w/punk singer Jello Biafra on one album ‘put a dome over candlestick park & evict the giants and let the homeless move in.’
‘Take those fans who stagger outta the bars yellin’ FORTY FUCKIN’ NINERS, take them with you too!’
Definitely could be billions and a football deal with a handful of games per year & even younger and shoddier stadium or full mask-off for capital totally bilking your city’s tax base of the more fascist variety & hosting the Olympics with lasting scars and dead zones for a 1-time thing?
$20M to fund this but feeding kids at school is a step too far. Maybe we can dip into the $1B voter-approved slush fund Multnomah County has to feed the homeless or provide universal preschool or whatever. Speaking of universal pre-school, did you see Mamdani already has that set up in NYC and they're taking applications next week? Holy cow, no wonder the establishment did everything they could to kneecap the guy.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, back to the issue at hand. Dundon is broke. I don't think there's any denying that. His credit cards are ALL maxed and, the bank has loaned him everything they're going to. The question to me is how much are we willing to give a guy who will end up torching us in the end? Giving him anything today just prolongs the inevitable. It sucks, but at least we'll have the Pilots.
House the homeless in MODA!
ReplyDelete