Is the state getting sued over Measure 110?

Regular readers here know how opposed I was, and still am, to Measure 110, the misguided Oregon ballot measure that essentially legalized possession of a week's supply of a whole variety of street drugs. In theory, the druggies were all going to get treatment instead of arrest, but of course, that was a blatantly false premise.

Like many terrible ideas about government, this one came with a committee to oversee it. And that state board, busily rearranging the deck chairs on this particular sinking luxury liner, are forever holding meetings. I hope they don't hold them in Portland, where thanks to Measure 110, it is no longer safe to walk. Anyway, the notice of next Thursday's meeting includes an interesting detail:

Measure 110 Oversight and Accountability Council to hold executive session at December 14 meeting

What: Public meetings of the Drug Treatment and Recovery Act (Measure 110) Oversight and Accountability Council.

Agenda: Executive Session is to be held under ORS 192.660(2)(f) and (h) to discuss attorney-client privileged legal advice and discuss documents that are confidential with the Oregon Department of Justice.

Those two sections of state law state:

(2)  The governing body of a public body may hold an executive session:...

  (f)  To consider information or records that are exempt by law from public inspection....

  (h)  To consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and duties of a public body with regard to current litigation or litigation likely to be filed.

I haven't heard anything that would indicate what the "current litigation or litigation likely to be filed" might be about. Have you?