Portland cops at their worst at Laurelhurst protest

This week's Saturday night edition of The Portland Protests saw demonstrators and the local police back at it. In a nasty incident at the county sheriff's office at 47th and East Burnside, the local cops behaved quite badly.

So ends a period of many nights in which the Portland police wisely lay low, allowing the protesters to mix it up with the federal paramilitary that was occupying the city. Last night, the marchers dared to go the local cops' house, and the police force lost its cool almost immediately.

The story started at Laurelhurst Park, where in the early evening a group, reported to be about 200 people, assembled to protest racial injustice and police brutality. After discussion and a vote – classic Portlandia – the group decided to march to the nearby sheriff's office, which used to be the Portland police southeast precinct and apparently is still used in part by the city cops.

There the marchers were met by helmeted, armed officers – I think they were sheriff's deputies – who lined up in front of the building. The usual taunting ensued. Somebody in the crowd was hauling a mattress, and that's a real trigger for the cops, apparently. I guess it is because some protesters are known to set them on fire. 

Although the freelance journalists present say they didn't see anything of the sort, before long the Portland police tweeted that someone had thrown bottles and pointed lasers at the officers. That set off a completely overblown, but not unfamiliar, police response.

A couple of vans full of Portland police showed up in riot gear. The Orwellian sound car also rolled in, with the DJ From Hell starting his high-decibel satanic mantras. "This is an unlawful assembly! Leave the area now. Move west on Burnside." Over and over. Whatever the legal significance of these announcements may be, their actual message is, "We're coming out there to kick your ass now, and we don't have to follow any rules any more." Nobody ever does what the DJ From Hell tells them to do. The whole thing is creepy.

Anyway, out marched several dozen Portland cops brandishing their batons and sub-machine guns. Nobody was throwing anything at this point; the protesters were standing in the intersection. But the police did their "bull rush" routine, in which they run right at the crowd, and anyone who can't get out of their way fast enough gets thrown to the ground, hit with batons, sprayed with pepper spray, or all of the above. Sometimes even people on the sidewalks get whacked. It doesn't matter if some medical condition or injury prevents you from running. If you don't move fast enough, you get hit.

If there really was someone throwing bottles, or shining lasers at police officer's eyes, do you think they were the ones who were beaten, maced, and thrown to the asphalt? 

It gets worse. One person who identified herself as a member of the "press" had the tires on her car slashed (or shot out) and her rear windshield smashed as she was trying to drive away from the scene. Glass landed in her lap in the driver's seat. 

She was livid. She said the cops did it. No other story would be believable. Especially since the police were heard taunting and mocking people they had just knocked to the ground.

The cops weren't satisfied to get the protesters away from the sheriff's office. They bull-rushed them all the way through the normally quiet Laurelhurst neighborhood, with Mr. DJ From Hell belting out his loud, apocalyptic warnings, until they were all the way south to Stark Street, or maybe it was even Belmont. Along the way, a few sympathetic residents of the neighborhood handed out bottled water and washed the mace out of demonstrators' eyes.

The police were obviously filming everyone assembled, and they scoffed at people's press credentials. On both counts, the freelance journalists kept saying the cops were violating recent court orders. Honestly, I don't think the Portland police listen to court orders, or any authority other than the police union. They kill unarmed, innocent people with impunity. Do you think they're afraid they're going to be punished over mere civil rights violations?

It isn't just last night, but I have come to the conclusion that as a group, the Portland police dislike free speech, especially when it is critical of them. And they are not just willing, but eager – eager! – to hurt people. They are damaged goods from a psychological standpoint, and the opposite of smart crowd control. It really is a shame that the politicians can't or won't bring them to heel.

Another close call at the courthouse

Meanwhile, Saturday night downtown seemed just like Friday night. A lot of racket at the Justice Center, a big crowd, but no violence, no cops. There was a smaller, peaceful NAACP event in Waterfront Park as well.


Except that toward the end of the evening, just before 2, someone set up the garbage pile we wrote about yesterday, in the same place, by the side door of the federal courthouse. And this time, they lit it on fire!

The flames got pretty big before some of the protesters put it out with water and their feet. No one admitted seeing who set the blaze. But whoever the fire guys are? They are real trouble.

Fortunately, the state police or whoever's inside the courthouse either didn't see the fire or didn't react to it. I can only imagine how brutal things would have gotten had the Portland police been there.

At about 1:00 in the morning, a couple of hundred protesters peeled off from the crowd at the courthouse and Justice Center to go on a march through downtown. They went west up Jefferson to the Cray-Cray Safeway, turned right on Tenth, and strolled all the way down into the Pearl District. There was a lot of chanting and bullhorn speeches. They were yelling that downtown residents should wake up and join them.

For a time it looked as though they were going to go back to the condo of the mayor, F. Ted Wheeler, but for some reason they decided against it. Go figure.


  1. Don't worry about the violence, Portland. Mayor Ted Wheeler is planning to give Police Commissioner Ted Wheeler a good talking to.

  2. Did you gather this story from videos or were you there?

  3. I'm not here to tell protesters how to conduct themselves or that my way is better. You will have to decide that for yourselves. However I personally will not be attending any more marches that hang out much past 9pm. I have a discussion about why I think that is best for myself to do here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/4089177597789684?view=permalink&id=4355110274529747

  4. https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/unlawful+assembly

  5. The question is whether the institution in this country known as "the police" has proved so insular, so powerful, so resistant to change and so pervasively complicit in the actions of what so many like to think are only "a few bad apples," that the institution has outlived its' usefulness in society. So many People of Color have experienced "the police" as an army of occupation or a hostile force in their communities, and/or as threats to their lives, a fear well founded as evidenced by the disproportionate number of People of Color who are arrested, prosecuted, brutalized, injured and killed in comparison to white people in the U.S. The "blue line" of silence, complicity, and moreover "endorsement" of the aggressive and violent practices is not considered by many to merely be the province of the few "bad apples" but a systemic problem perpetuated for generations by the military training in the use of force and weapons common to all police officers, the "qualified immunity" that police officers enjoy with regard to literally any of their actions on the job, the "us versus them mentality" and the power of police unions to zealously defend all of its members, even in the face of substantial and very real economic costs imposed on all citizens in the form of monetary judgments and settlements for injury, wrongful death, and violations of civil rights arising from police "actions." Recall the City of Portland's settlement with the family of James Chasse for $1.6 million. For those who I have noted "react" to the idea of a fundamental change to the "police" as an institution by saying it would be crazy, I submit that repeating the same actions with minor efforts at sensitivity and bias training, cross cultural orientation, and then finding that the number of POC who are wronged, injured, or killed has not been reduced is the ultimate in "crazy," doing the same things that have not proved effective and hoping somehow that it will work this next time.

  6. I say wow. The police are not the problem. The protests have gone on for far to long. It's time to give it a rest. Time to let go. All you are doing is dividing our country. Nothing is being accomplished.

  7. It's okay that you don't want to exercise your First Amendment rights, but let's not tell other people that they shouldn't exercise their First Amendment rights. If people wish to exercise them every day, that is their choice. "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Evelyn Beatrice Hall (28 September 1868 – 13 April 1956) (Often erroneously ascribed to Voltaire.)


Post a Comment

The platform used for this blog is awfully wonky when it comes to comments. It may work for you, it may not. It's a Google thing, and beyond my control. Apologies if you can't get through. You can email me a comment at jackbogsblog@comcast.net, and if it's appropriate, I can post it here for you.